All information was gathered by using information that was publicly displayed by Twitter, YouTube, or Google.
The gathering of data was just an organization of public data for the ease of use for others to use for FREE.
All information was used in the Intention of the Fair Use Index for Reference Information only.
The First Amendment provides that Congress make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting its free exercise. It protects freedom of speech, the press, assembly, and the right to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. The Second Amendment gives citizens the right to bear arms.
All my accounts with these companies were searched, approved and expressly promoted the data. Under the United State of America Law they are responsible for their public content. Each platform retracted or deleted any content they found violating there terms or conditions using AI on my account as noted on the website.
Any Legal implications of this data should be sent to one of the following companies listed below:
Twitter Terms of Service was followed and have the copy in my possession at time of publication for future use in a court of law.
ELON Musk was indirectly and directly aware of my website, my content and website was tagged to his Twitter account and his twitter bots accounts. I have the documentation and proof if needed in a court of law.
I appreciate and give him the credit to this Masterpiece of Data that he promoted personally under his Free Speech Platform.
Please Contact Twitter for any issues with his platforms content:
X Corp.
1355 Market Street, Suite 900
San Francisco, CA 94103
or
Twitter International Unlimited Company
C/O Trust & Safety - Legal Policy
One Cumberland Place
Fenian Street
Dublin 2
D02 AX07
Ireland
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Google Terms of Service was followed and a copy has been retained as the date of this publication for future use in a Court of Law.
Google Corporate headquarters
1600 Amphitheatre Parkway in Mountain View, California
----------------------------------------------------------------------
YouTube Terms of Service was followed and a copy has been retained as the date of this publication for future use in a Court of Law.
Please Contact YouTube for any issues with its platforms content:
YouTube, LLC 901 Cherry Ave. San Bruno, CA 94066 USA
----------------------------------------------------------------------
About Fair Use Index
Fair use is a legal doctrine that promotes freedom of expression by permitting the unlicensed use of copyright-protected works in certain circumstances. Section 107 of the Copyright Act provides the statutory framework for determining whether something is a fair use and identifies certain types of uses—such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research—as examples of activities that may qualify as fair use. Section 107 calls for consideration of the following four factors in evaluating a question of fair use:
- Purpose and character of the use, including whether the use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes: Courts look at how the party claiming fair use is using the copyrighted work, and are more likely to find that nonprofit educational and noncommercial uses are fair. This does not mean, however, that all nonprofit education and noncommercial uses are fair and all commercial uses are not fair; instead, courts will balance the purpose and character of the use against the other factors below. Additionally, “transformative” uses are more likely to be considered fair. Transformative uses are those that add something new, with a further purpose or different character, and do not substitute for the original use of the work.
- Nature of the copyrighted work: This factor analyzes the degree to which the work that was used relates to copyright’s purpose of encouraging creative expression. Thus, using a more creative or imaginative work (such as a novel, movie, or song) is less likely to support a claim of a fair use than using a factual work (such as a technical article or news item). In addition, use of an unpublished work is less likely to be considered fair.
- Amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole: Under this factor, courts look at both the quantity and quality of the copyrighted material that was used. If the use includes a large portion of the copyrighted work, fair use is less likely to be found; if the use employs only a small amount of copyrighted material, fair use is more likely. That said, some courts have found use of an entire work to be fair under certain circumstances. And in other contexts, using even a small amount of a copyrighted work was determined not to be fair because the selection was an important part—or the “heart”—of the work.
- Effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work: Here, courts review whether, and to what extent, the unlicensed use harms the existing or future market for the copyright owner’s original work. In assessing this factor, courts consider whether the use is hurting the current market for the original work (for example, by displacing sales of the original) and/or whether the use could cause substantial harm if it were to become widespread.
In addition to the above, other factors may also be considered by a court in weighing a fair use question, depending upon the circumstances. Courts evaluate fair use claims on a case-bycase basis, and the outcome of any given case depends on a fact-specific inquiry. This means that there is no formula to ensure that a predetermined percentage or amount of a work—or specific number of words, lines, pages, copies—may be used without permission.